Scientists in Lab Coats Accidentally Build Billion-Dollar Startup Without Becoming Founders or Posting on LinkedIn
- Felicia Lal
- Jul 24
- 2 min read
University of Queensland research commercialised through Vicebio, nets $245m payday, zero Canva templates involved.

In a historic win for introverts, white coats, and anyone who's ever had to Google "SAFE note", the University of Queensland has just pulled off the biotech equivalent of a mic drop, without launching a startup, pitching on a rooftop, or learning how to pronounce "cap table".
French pharma giant Sanofi just announced a $1.76 billion acquisition of London-based vaccine startup Vicebio, in a deal that somehow benefits both Goldman Sachs and an Australian university. (Yes, you read that right. No, it’s not satire. Yet.)
Not your average Series B syndicate
Goldman and UQ both got in on Vicebio’s Series B, and now UQ’s 10% stake could deliver up to $245 million back to Brisbane — which is what we assume happens when an actual deep tech commercialisation play works out without someone in a Patagonia vest giving a TEDx talk about it.
The tech behind Vicebio? A “molecular clamp” developed by three scientists at UQ.The exit strategy? License it to a European fund and let them do the PowerPoints.The vibe? Academic, elegant, and somehow richer than half the Queensland VC ecosystem.
UniQuest? More like UniBanked
The deal is also a rare win for UniQuest, UQ’s commercialisation arm, which licensed the tech to Vicebio back in 2018. UniQuest was later allocated a 17.5% stake when Vicebio issued new shares, although it’s still unclear whether that was in return for equity, licensing, or just really good IP admin.
Meanwhile, Medicxi (the European fund, not the Renaissance family, although similar vibes) owned the startup outright for nearly three years, before finally letting the Aussies in.
A new model for Aussie research? Or just good old-fashioned luck?
Deep tech insiders like Elaine Stead and Anthony Liveris are pointing to the deal as a template for how Aussie science might scale without forcing researchers to launch companies called “AntibodAI”.
UQ scientists got their payday, Australia got a biotech headline that wasn’t about government funding cuts, and investors got a rare win in what Liveris calls a “nuclear winter” for biotech. (Translation: it’s grim out there, unless you’re wearing a lab coat and accidentally build a unicorn.)
Meanwhile in Silicon Valley...
Founders are still trying to pivot their AI shopping assistants into mental health platforms while UQ just made a quarter-billion dollars by licensing a vaccine tech six years ago. No launch event, no beachside offsite, no Canva logo refresh.
Some are calling it luck.We’re calling it science.
Bottom line:The scientists stayed scientists. The uni kept the IP. And the only "exit plan" involved a licensing agreement and a French pharma giant.
Queensland, you beautiful nerdy beast: never change.
.png)



Comments